Roedel, Joerg wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:11:17AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This overflow should have left the check broken behind for 32-bit hosts. > > The check itself should work but it gives a compile warning for me (at > least in my small userspace test I did ;) Good catch, thanks. To my understanding, the test degraded to value != 0x00010015. That may not have the intended effect, no? Jan > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> > >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> index 3c03c36..fd32791 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> @@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static bool is_erratum_383(void) >> /* Bit 62 may or may not be set for this mce */ >> value &= ~(1ULL << 62); >> >> - if (value != 0xb600000000010015) >> + if (value != 0xb600000000010015ULL) >> return false; >> >> /* Clear MCi_STATUS registers */ >> -- >> 1.6.0.2 >> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
