Hi Marc, On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 04:25:00PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:53:13 +0100, > Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > I would like to use the S1 walker for KVM SPE, and I was planning to move it to > > a separate file, where it would be shared between nested KVM and SPE. I think > > this is also good for NV, since the walker would get more testing. > > > > Do you think moving it to a shared location is a good approach? Or do you have > > something else in mind? > > I'm definitely open to moving it somewhere else if that helps, though > the location doesn't matter much, TBH, and it is the boundary of the > interface I'm more interested in. It may need some work though, as the > current design is solely written with AT in mind. Looks that way to me too. > > > Also, do you know where you'll be able to send an updated version of this > > series? I'm asking because I want to decide between using this code (with fixes > > on top) or wait for the next iteration. Please don't feel that you need to send > > the next iteration too soon. > > The current state of the branch is at [1], which I plan to send once > -rc1 is out. Note that this isn't a stable branch, so things can > change without any warning! > > > And please CC me on the series, so I don't miss it by mistake :) > > Of course! Sounds great, thanks! Alex > > Thanks, > > M. > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=kvm-arm64/nv-at-pan-WIP > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. >
