Hi Alex, On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:53:13 +0100, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > I would like to use the S1 walker for KVM SPE, and I was planning to move it to > a separate file, where it would be shared between nested KVM and SPE. I think > this is also good for NV, since the walker would get more testing. > > Do you think moving it to a shared location is a good approach? Or do you have > something else in mind? I'm definitely open to moving it somewhere else if that helps, though the location doesn't matter much, TBH, and it is the boundary of the interface I'm more interested in. It may need some work though, as the current design is solely written with AT in mind. > Also, do you know where you'll be able to send an updated version of this > series? I'm asking because I want to decide between using this code (with fixes > on top) or wait for the next iteration. Please don't feel that you need to send > the next iteration too soon. The current state of the branch is at [1], which I plan to send once -rc1 is out. Note that this isn't a stable branch, so things can change without any warning! > And please CC me on the series, so I don't miss it by mistake :) Of course! Thanks, M. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=kvm-arm64/nv-at-pan-WIP -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
