Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:35:47 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> in rare cases, e.g. for injecting a machine check we do intercept all
> load PSW instructions via ICTL_LPSW. With facility 193 a new variant
> LPSWEY was added. KVM needs to handle that as well.
> 
> Fixes: a3efa8429266 ("KVM: s390: gen_facilities: allow facilities 165, 193, 194 and 196")
> Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

With the whitespace error reported by Sven fixed:

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |  1 +
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h         | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/s390/kvm/priv.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 95990461888f..9281063636a7 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
>  	u64 instruction_io_other;
>  	u64 instruction_lpsw;
>  	u64 instruction_lpswe;
> +	u64 instruction_lpswey;
>  	u64 instruction_pfmf;
>  	u64 instruction_ptff;
>  	u64 instruction_sck;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 50b77b759042..8e04c7f0c90c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vcpu_stats_desc[] = {
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_io_other),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_lpsw),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_lpswe),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_lpswey),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_pfmf),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_ptff),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_sck),
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
> index 111eb5c74784..1b326f3c3383 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,21 @@ static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 *ar)
>  	return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + disp2;
>  }
>  
> +static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_siy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 *ar)
> +{
> +	u32 base1 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
> +	s64 disp1;
> +       
> +	/* The displacement is a 20bit _SIGNED_ value */
> +	disp1 = sign_extend64(((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16) +
> +			      ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xff00) << 4), 19);
> +
> +	if (ar)
> +		*ar = base1;
> +
> +	return (base1 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base1] : 0) + disp1;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void kvm_s390_get_base_disp_sse(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  					      u64 *address1, u64 *address2,
>  					      u8 *ar_b1, u8 *ar_b2)
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
> index 1be19cc9d73c..1a49b89706f8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
> @@ -797,6 +797,36 @@ static int handle_lpswe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int handle_lpswey(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	psw_t new_psw;
> +	u64 addr;
> +	int rc;
> +	u8 ar;
> +
> +	vcpu->stat.instruction_lpswey++;
> +
> +	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 193))
> +		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
> +
> +	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
> +		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
> +
> +	addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_siy(vcpu, &ar);
> +	if (addr & 7)
> +		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
> +
> +	rc = read_guest(vcpu, addr, ar, &new_psw, sizeof(new_psw));
> +	if (rc)
> +		return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw = new_psw;
> +	if (!is_valid_psw(&vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw))
> +		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int handle_stidp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	u64 stidp_data = vcpu->kvm->arch.model.cpuid;
> @@ -1462,6 +1492,8 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_eb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	case 0x61:
>  	case 0x62:
>  		return handle_ri(vcpu);
> +	case 0x71:
> +		return handle_lpswey(vcpu);
>  	default:
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux