Hi Marc,
On 6/13/24 16:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:31:45 +0100,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we don't care about the FEAT_CNTSC right now. Could I fix the
compile issue and respin this again without the background of enabling
migration between MtCollins and AmpereOne, and just keep the
information of the different BT field between different machine?
As I said, I think this patch is valuable. But maybe you should
consider tackling the full register, rather than only addressing a
single field.
Yes, it would be better to tackling the full register. I will put more
time on other fields in the register and try to making more field to be
writable. But currently I just respin the series with deleting the
machine specific information and fixing the compilation issue.
Thanks,
Shaoqin
Thanks,
M.
--
Shaoqin
