On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:31:45 +0100, Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we don't care about the FEAT_CNTSC right now. Could I fix the > compile issue and respin this again without the background of enabling > migration between MtCollins and AmpereOne, and just keep the > information of the different BT field between different machine? As I said, I think this patch is valuable. But maybe you should consider tackling the full register, rather than only addressing a single field. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
