Hi Sean, On 4/25/2024 9:17 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> There was one vote for the capability name to rather be KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_CYCLES_NS [1] >> >> I'd be happy to resubmit with the name changed but after reading your >> statement above it is not clear to me what name is preferred: >> KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_FREQUENCY as used in this series that seem to meet your >> approval or KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_CYCLES_NS. >> >> Please let me know what you prefer. > > Both work for me, I don't have a strong preference. Thank you. I'll resubmit with the capability name changed to KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_CYCLES_NS. This is the only planned change. Reinette
