On Wed, Apr 24, 2024, Reinette Chatre wrote: > There was one vote for the capability name to rather be KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_CYCLES_NS [1] > > I'd be happy to resubmit with the name changed but after reading your > statement above it is not clear to me what name is preferred: > KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_FREQUENCY as used in this series that seem to meet your > approval or KVM_CAP_X86_APIC_BUS_CYCLES_NS. > > Please let me know what you prefer. Both work for me, I don't have a strong preference.
