On 3/15/24 12:38, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> tdh_mem_page_remove() _should_ just be logically: >> >> * initialize tdx_module_args. Move a few things into place on >> the stack and zero the rest. > The "zero the rest" is what generates the fugly code. The underlying problem is > that the SEAMCALL assembly functions unpack _all_ registers from tdx_module_args. > As a result, tdx_module_args needs to be zeroed to avoid loading registers with > unitialized stack data. It's the "zero the rest" and also the copy: > + if (out) { > + *out = *in; > + ret = seamcall_ret(op, out); > + } else > + ret = seamcall(op, in); Things get a wee bit nicer if you do an out-of-line mempcy() instead of the structure copy. But the really fun part is that 'out' is NULL and the compiler *SHOULD* know it. I'm not actually sure what trips it up. In any case, I think it ends up generating code for both sides of the if/else including the entirely superfluous copy. The two nested while loops (one for TDX_RND_NO_ENTROPY and the other for TDX_ERROR_SEPT_BUSY) also don't make for great code generation. So, sure, the generated code here could be a better. But there's a lot more going on here than just shuffling gunk in and out of the 'struct tdx_module_args', and there's a _lot_ more work to do for one of these than for a plain old kvm_hypercall*(). It might make sense to separate out the "out" functionality into and maybe to uninline _some_ of the helper levels. But after that, there's not a lot of low hanging fruit.