On Mon Mar 4, 2024 at 4:22 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 26/02/2024 10.38, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > This test stores to a bunch of pages and verifies previous stores,
> > while being continually migrated. This can fail due to a QEMU TCG
> > physical memory dirty bitmap bug.
>
> Good idea, but could we then please drop "continuous" test from
> selftest-migration.c again? ... having two common tests to exercise the
> continuous migration that take quite a bunch of seconds to finish sounds
> like a waste of time in the long run to me.
Yeah if you like. I could shorten them up a bit. I did want to have
the selftests for just purely testing the harness with as little
"test" code as possible.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > common/memory-verify.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > powerpc/Makefile.common | 1 +
> > powerpc/memory-verify.c | 1 +
> > powerpc/unittests.cfg | 7 ++++++
> > s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> > s390x/memory-verify.c | 1 +
> > s390x/unittests.cfg | 6 ++++++
> > 7 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 common/memory-verify.c
> > create mode 120000 powerpc/memory-verify.c
> > create mode 120000 s390x/memory-verify.c
> >
> > diff --git a/common/memory-verify.c b/common/memory-verify.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000..7c4ec087b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/common/memory-verify.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Simple memory verification test, used to exercise dirty memory migration.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +#include <libcflat.h>
> > +#include <migrate.h>
> > +#include <alloc.h>
> > +#include <asm/page.h>
> > +#include <asm/time.h>
> > +
> > +#define NR_PAGES 32
> > +
> > +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > + void *mem = malloc(NR_PAGES*PAGE_SIZE);
> > + bool success = true;
> > + uint64_t ms;
> > + long i;
> > +
> > + report_prefix_push("memory");
> > +
> > + memset(mem, 0, NR_PAGES*PAGE_SIZE);
> > +
> > + migrate_begin_continuous();
> > + ms = get_clock_ms();
> > + i = 0;
> > + do {
> > + int j;
> > +
> > + for (j = 0; j < NR_PAGES*PAGE_SIZE; j += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > + if (*(volatile long *)(mem + j) != i) {
> > + success = false;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + *(volatile long *)(mem + j) = i + 1;
> > + }
> > + i++;
> > + } while (get_clock_ms() - ms < 5000);
>
> Maybe add a parameter so that the user can use different values for the
> runtime than always doing 5 seconds?
Sure.
Thanks,
Nick
