On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 16:23:40 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Add a VMX flag in /proc/cpuinfo, ept_5level, so that userspace can query > whether or not the CPU supports 5-level EPT paging. EPT capabilities are > enumerated via MSR, i.e. aren't accessible to userspace without help from > the kernel, and knowing whether or not 5-level EPT is supported is sadly > necessary for userspace to correctly configure KVM VMs. > > When EPT is enabled, bits 51:49 of guest physical addresses are consumed > if and only if 5-level EPT is enabled. For CPUs with MAXPHYADDR > 48, KVM > *can't* map all legal guest memory if 5-level EPT is unsupported, e.g. > creating a VM with RAM (or anything that gets stuffed into KVM's memslots) > above bit 48 will be completely broken. > > [...] Applied to kvm-x86 vmx, with a massaged changelog to avoid presenting this as a bug fix (and finally fixed the 51:49=>51:48 goof): Add a VMX flag in /proc/cpuinfo, ept_5level, so that userspace can query whether or not the CPU supports 5-level EPT paging. EPT capabilities are enumerated via MSR, i.e. aren't accessible to userspace without help from the kernel, and knowing whether or not 5-level EPT is supported is useful for debug, triage, testing, etc. For example, when EPT is enabled, bits 51:48 of guest physical addresses are consumed by the CPU if and only if 5-level EPT is enabled. For CPUs with MAXPHYADDR > 48, KVM *can't* map all legal guest memory if 5-level EPT is unsupported, making it more or less necessary to know whether or not 5-level EPT is supported. [1/1] x86/cpu: Add a VMX flag to enumerate 5-level EPT support to userspace https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/b1a3c366cbc7 -- https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next