On 2024/2/15 下午6:25, WANG Xuerui wrote:
On 2/15/24 18:11, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Sorry for the late reply (and Happy Chinese New Year), and thanks for
providing microbenchmark numbers! But it seems the more comprehensive
CoreMark results were omitted (that's also absent in v3)? While the
Of course the benchmark suite should be UnixBench instead of CoreMark.
Lesson: don't multi-task code reviews, especially not after consuming
beer -- a cup of coffee won't fully cancel the influence. ;-)
Where is rule about benchmark choices like UnixBench/Coremark for ipi
improvement?
Regards
Bibo Mao
