On 2/15/24 18:11, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Sorry for the late reply (and Happy Chinese New Year), and thanks for providing microbenchmark numbers! But it seems the more comprehensive CoreMark results were omitted (that's also absent in v3)? While the
Of course the benchmark suite should be UnixBench instead of CoreMark. Lesson: don't multi-task code reviews, especially not after consuming beer -- a cup of coffee won't fully cancel the influence. ;-)
-- WANG "xen0n" Xuerui Linux/LoongArch mailing list: https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/
