On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 02:55:50PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The effective MXL value matters when booting. I'd prefer this commit message get some elaboration. riscv_is_32bit() is used in a variety of contexts, some where it should be reporting the max misa.mxl. However, when used for booting an S-mode kernel it should indeed report the effective mxl. I think we're fine with the change, though, because at init and on reset the effective mxl is set to the max mxl, so, in those contexts, where riscv_is_32bit() should be reporting the max, it does. > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-Id: <20240103173349.398526-23-alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-1-a760156a337f@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > hw/riscv/boot.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/riscv/boot.c b/hw/riscv/boot.c > index 0ffca05189f..bc67c0bd189 100644 > --- a/hw/riscv/boot.c > +++ b/hw/riscv/boot.c > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ > > bool riscv_is_32bit(RISCVHartArrayState *harts) > { > - return harts->harts[0].env.misa_mxl_max == MXL_RV32; > + return harts->harts[0].env.misa_mxl == MXL_RV32; > } Assuming everyone agrees with what I've written above, then maybe we should write something similar in a comment above this function. Thanks, drew