Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] hw/riscv: Use misa_mxl instead of misa_mxl_max

[Alistair Francis <alistair23@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:57 AM Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The effective MXL value matters when booting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-Id: <20240103173349.398526-23-alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-1-a760156a337f@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>

Alistair

> ---
>  hw/riscv/boot.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/boot.c b/hw/riscv/boot.c
> index 0ffca05189f..bc67c0bd189 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/boot.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/boot.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>
>  bool riscv_is_32bit(RISCVHartArrayState *harts)
>  {
> -    return harts->harts[0].env.misa_mxl_max == MXL_RV32;
> +    return harts->harts[0].env.misa_mxl == MXL_RV32;
>  }
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>