RE: [PATCH v6 2/6] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 9:22 PM
> 
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 03:53:40PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> 
> > > >  From that thread Jason mentioned to make the invalidation format
> > > > part of domain allocation. If that is the direction to go then there
> > > > won't be multiple invalidation formats per hwpt. The user should
> > > > create multiple hwpt's per invalidation format (though mixing
> > > > formats in one virtual platform is very unlikely)?
> > >
> > > I think we could do either, but I have a vauge cleanness preference
> > > that the enums are just different? That would follow a pretty typical
> > > pattern for a structure tag to reflect the content of the structure.
> >
> > Is this still following the direction to make the invalidation format
> > part of domain allocation?
> 
> I think you should make it seperate

Sure. I'll add a separate enum for cache invalidation format. Just to
see if it is good to pass down the invalidation format in the hwpt
alloc path? So iommu driver can check if the invalidation format
can be used for the hwpt to be allocated.

Regards,
Yi Liu





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux