On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 11:17 +0000, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > Decouple kvm_range_has_memory_attributes() from struct kvm's > mem_attr_array to allow other memory attribute sources to use the > function. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 ++- > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ++-- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 +++++---- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index 96421234ca88..4ace2f8660b0 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -7297,7 +7297,8 @@ static bool hugepage_has_attrs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, > const unsigned long end = start + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level); > > if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M) > - return kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(kvm, start, end, attrs); > + return kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array, > + start, end, attrs); > > for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1)) { > if (hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, level - 1) || > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > index 4242588e3dfb..32cf05637647 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > @@ -2391,8 +2391,8 @@ kvm_get_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t gfn) > return xa_to_value(xa_load(mem_attr_array, gfn)); > } > > -bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, > - unsigned long attrs); > +bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t start, > + gfn_t end, unsigned long attrs); > bool kvm_arch_pre_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_gfn_range *range); > bool kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index fde004a0ac46..6bb23eaf7aa6 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -2440,10 +2440,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_clear_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, > * Returns true if _all_ gfns in the range [@start, @end) have attributes > * matching @attrs. > */ > -bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, > - unsigned long attrs) > +bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t start, > + gfn_t end, unsigned long attrs) > { > - XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start); > + XA_STATE(xas, mem_attr_array, start); > unsigned long index; > bool has_attrs; > void *entry; > @@ -2582,7 +2582,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end, > mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock); > > /* Nothing to do if the entire range as the desired attributes. */ > - if (kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(kvm, start, end, attributes)) > + if (kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array, start, end, > + attributes)) > goto out_unlock; > > /* Same comments as for previous patch + how about 'kvm_gfn_range_has_memory_attributes' (I didn't review the memfd patch series and it shows :( ) Best regards, Maxim Levitsky