On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 11:17 +0000, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Decouple kvm_get_memory_attributes() from struct kvm's mem_attr_array to
> allow other memory attribute sources to use the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 5 +++--
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index a1fbb905258b..96421234ca88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -7301,7 +7301,7 @@ static bool hugepage_has_attrs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>
> for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1)) {
> if (hugepage_test_mixed(slot, gfn, level - 1) ||
> - attrs != kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn))
> + attrs != kvm_get_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn))
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> @@ -7401,7 +7401,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_init_memslot_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> * be manually checked as the attributes may already be mixed.
> */
> for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += nr_pages) {
> - unsigned long attrs = kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn);
> + unsigned long attrs =
> + kvm_get_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn);
>
> if (hugepage_has_attrs(kvm, slot, gfn, level, attrs))
> hugepage_clear_mixed(slot, gfn, level);
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 631fd532c97a..4242588e3dfb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2385,9 +2385,10 @@ static inline void kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> -static inline unsigned long kvm_get_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +static inline unsigned long
> +kvm_get_memory_attributes(struct xarray *mem_attr_array, gfn_t gfn)
> {
> - return xa_to_value(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn));
> + return xa_to_value(xa_load(mem_attr_array, gfn));
> }
Can we wrap the 'struct xarray *' with a struct even if it will have a single member
to make it clearer what type the 'kvm_get_memory_attributes' receives.
Also maybe rename this to something like 'kvm_get_memory_attributes_for_gfn'?
>
> bool kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> @@ -2400,7 +2401,8 @@ bool kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> {
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM) &&
> - kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> + kvm_get_memory_attributes(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn) &
> + KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> }
> #else
> static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
Also if we go with VM per VTL approach, we won't need this, each VM can already have its own memory attributes.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
