On 2023/9/22 20:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:44:45AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
@@ -112,6 +110,7 @@ int iommu_queue_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, struct device *dev)
{
int ret;
struct iopf_group *group;
+ struct iommu_domain *domain;
struct iopf_fault *iopf, *next;
struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param;
struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
@@ -143,6 +142,19 @@ int iommu_queue_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
+ if (fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID)
+ domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(dev, fault->prm.pasid, 0);
+ else
+ domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
+
+ if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler) {
Does it need to check if 'domain' is error ? Like below:
if (!domain || IS_ERR(domain) || !domain->iopf_handler)
Urk, yes, but not like that
The IF needs to be moved into the else block as each individual
function has its own return convention.
iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() returns an ERR_PTR only if the matching
domain type is specified (non-zero).
Adding IS_ERR(domain) in the else block will make the code more
readable. Alternatively we can put a comment around above code to
explain that ERR_PTR is not a case here.
You should check it because you'll probably get a static tool
complaint otherwise
Okay, got you.
Best regards,
baolu
