On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:44:45AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> > > > @@ -112,6 +110,7 @@ int iommu_queue_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, struct device *dev)
> > > > {
> > > > int ret;
> > > > struct iopf_group *group;
> > > > + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> > > > struct iopf_fault *iopf, *next;
> > > > struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param;
> > > > struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
> > > > @@ -143,6 +142,19 @@ int iommu_queue_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, struct device *dev)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > + if (fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID)
> > > > + domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(dev, fault->prm.pasid, 0);
> > > > + else
> > > > + domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler) {
> > >
> > > Does it need to check if 'domain' is error ? Like below:
> > >
> > > if (!domain || IS_ERR(domain) || !domain->iopf_handler)
> >
> > Urk, yes, but not like that
> >
> > The IF needs to be moved into the else block as each individual
> > function has its own return convention.
>
> iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() returns an ERR_PTR only if the matching
> domain type is specified (non-zero).
>
> Adding IS_ERR(domain) in the else block will make the code more
> readable. Alternatively we can put a comment around above code to
> explain that ERR_PTR is not a case here.
You should check it because you'll probably get a static tool
complaint otherwise
Jason
