Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/14/2010 03:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> On 04/14/2010 03:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> >>>> When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if it exists, has >>>> to be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits. >>>> >>>> >>>> @@ -2416,12 +2417,23 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, >>>> ops->set_cached_descriptor(&next_tss_desc, VCPU_SREG_TR, ctxt->vcpu); >>>> ops->set_segment_selector(tss_selector, VCPU_SREG_TR, ctxt->vcpu); >>>> >>>> + if (ret == X86EMUL_CONTINUE&& has_error_code) { >>>> + struct decode_cache *c =&ctxt->decode; >>>> + >>>> + c->op_bytes = c->ad_bytes = (next_tss_desc.type& 8) ? 4 : 2; >>>> >>>> >>> Don't these depend on the attributes of the segment as well? >>> >> Not on the segment, but actually on the gate size. Will fix. >> > > The TSS descriptor (gate doesn't have a size). But isn't it possible to > have a 32-bit TSS with a 16-bit CS/SS? Might be possible, but will cause troubles as the spec says: "The error code is pushed on the stack as a doubleword or word (depending on the default interrupt, trap, or task gate size)." Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html