> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 2:37 PM
>
> On 2023/8/21 14:33, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 1:45 PM
> >>
> >> On 2023/8/18 11:56, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >>>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 9:18 AM
> >>>>
> >>>> The PASID interfaces have always supported only single-device groups.
> >>>> This was first introduced in commit 26b25a2b98e45 ("iommu: Bind
> >> process
> >>>> address spaces to devices"), and has been kept consistent in
> subsequent
> >>>> commits.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, the core code doesn't explicitly check for this requirement
> >>>> after commit 201007ef707a8 ("PCI: Enable PASID only when ACS RR &
> UF
> >>>> enabled on upstream path"), which made this requirement implicit.
> >>>>
> >>>> Restore the check to make it explicit that the PASID interfaces only
> >>>> support devices belonging to single-device groups.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 5 +++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> >>>> index 71b9c41f2a9e..f1eba60e573f 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> >>>> @@ -3408,6 +3408,11 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct
> >>>> iommu_domain *domain,
> >>>> return -ENODEV;
> >>>>
> >>>> mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
> >>>> + if (list_count_nodes(&group->devices) != 1) {
> >>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>> + goto out_unlock;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> I wonder whether we should also block adding new device to this
> >>> group once the single-device has pasid enabled. Otherwise the
> >>
> >> This has been guaranteed by pci_enable_pasid():
> >>
> >> if (!pci_acs_path_enabled(pdev, NULL, PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_UF))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >
> > well since you are adding generic core check then it's not good to
> > rely on the fact of a specific bus...
>
> We attempted to do this in the patch linked below.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220705050710.2887204-5-
> baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> After long discussion, we decided to move it to the pci_enable_pasid()
> interface. The non-static single device group is only relevant to PCI
> fabrics that support hot-plugging without ACS support on the upstream
> path.
>
If that's the case better add a comment to include this fact. So
another one looking at this code won't fall into the same puzzle
wondering what about a group becoming non-singleton after
above check. 😊
