Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu: Make single-device group for PASID explicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/8/18 11:56, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 9:18 AM

The PASID interfaces have always supported only single-device groups.
This was first introduced in commit 26b25a2b98e45 ("iommu: Bind process
address spaces to devices"), and has been kept consistent in subsequent
commits.

However, the core code doesn't explicitly check for this requirement
after commit 201007ef707a8 ("PCI: Enable PASID only when ACS RR & UF
enabled on upstream path"), which made this requirement implicit.

Restore the check to make it explicit that the PASID interfaces only
support devices belonging to single-device groups.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 5 +++++
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 71b9c41f2a9e..f1eba60e573f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -3408,6 +3408,11 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
  		return -ENODEV;

  	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
+	if (list_count_nodes(&group->devices) != 1) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+

I wonder whether we should also block adding new device to this
group once the single-device has pasid enabled. Otherwise the

This has been guaranteed by pci_enable_pasid():

        if (!pci_acs_path_enabled(pdev, NULL, PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_UF))
                return -EINVAL;

check alone at attach time doesn't mean this group won't be
expanded to have multiple devices later.

Best regards,
baolu



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux