On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 05.04.2010, at 21:37, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:34:26 +0200 >> Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> I'm interested in adding nested VMX support to KVM in GSoC 2010 (among >>> other things). I see that Orit Wasserman has done some work in this >>> area, but it didn't get merged yet. The last patches were a few months >>> ago and I have not seen any substantial progress in that front ever >>> since. >>> >>> I wonder whether the previous work can be used as a starting ground >>> for any future effort? What is missing from it? What are the current >>> limitations of that implementation? And how can it be extended? >>> >>> And within the scopr of GSoC, what do you think the achievments of >>> such a project should be? >> >> Alex, weren't you involved in nested VMX support too? > > Nope, I only did nested SVM. I know rather little about VMX except for the basic principles. > > Alex > > Maybe Orit Wasserman or Avi would have some feedback on this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
