On 12.07.23 г. 11:55 ч., Kai Huang wrote:
The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG". Currently, the kernel
doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
prefix "TDX_" for all of them. Although it's arguable whether the TDX
spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
the spec when naming those macros.
Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec. As
a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
which all have prefix "TDH".
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
index 5b8056f6c83f..de021df92009 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
/* TDX module Call Leaf IDs */
-#define TDX_GET_INFO 1
-#define TDX_GET_VEINFO 3
-#define TDX_GET_REPORT 4
-#define TDX_ACCEPT_PAGE 6
-#define TDX_WR 8
+#define TDG_VP_INFO 1
+#define TDG_VP_VEINFO_GET 3
+#define TDG_MR_REPORT 4
+#define TDG_MEM_PAGE_ACCEPT 6
+#define TDG_VM_WR 8
What branch is this patch set based off? Because the existing TDX_GET_*
defines are in arch/x86/include/asm/shared/tdx.h due to ff40b5769a50f ?
<snip>
