On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 06:39:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> So, two users can't have a guest named MyGuest each? What about >> namespace support? There's a lot of work in virtualizing all kernel >> namespaces, you're adding to that. > > This enumeration is a very small and non-intrusive feature. Making it > aware of namespaces is easy too. an outsider's comment: this path leads to a filesystem... which could be a very nice idea. it could have a directory for each VM, with pseudo-files with all the guest's status, and even the memory it's using. perf could simply watch those files. in fact, such a filesystem could be the main userleve/kernel interface. but i'm sure such a layour was considered (and rejected) very early in the KVM design. i don't think there's anything new to make it more desirable than it was back then. -- Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
