* Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 12:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >This is really just the much-discredited microkernel approach for keeping
> >global enumeration data that should be kept by the kernel ...
> >
> >Lets look at the ${HOME}/.qemu/qmp/ enumeration method suggested by Anthony.
> >There's numerous ways that this can break:
> >
> > - Those special files can get corrupted, mis-setup, get out of sync, or can
> > be hard to discover.
> >
> > - The ${HOME}/.qemu/qmp/ solution suggested by Anthony has a very obvious
> > design flaw: it is per user. When i'm root i'd like to query _all_ current
> > guest images, not just the ones started by root. A system might not even
> > have a notion of '${HOME}'.
> >
> > - Apps might start KVM vcpu instances without adhering to the
> > ${HOME}/.qemu/qmp/ access method.
> >
> > - There is no guarantee for the Qemu process to reply to a request - while
> > the kernel can always guarantee an enumeration result. I dont want 'perf
> > kvm' to hang or misbehave just because Qemu has hung.
>
> If your position basically boils down to, we can't trust userspace
> and we can always trust the kernel, I want to eliminate any
> userspace path, then I can't really help you out.
Why would you want to 'help me out'? I can tell a good solution from a bad one
just fine.
You should instead read the long list of disadvantages above, invert them and
list then as advantages for the kernel-based vcpu enumeration solution, apply
common sense and go admit to yourself that indeed in this situation a kernel
provided enumeration of vcpu contexts is the most robust solution.
It's really as simple as that :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
