Re: [PATCH RFCv2 04/24] iommu: Add iommu_domain ops for dirty tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/05/2023 12:51, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> 
>> In practice it is done as soon after the domain is created but I understand what
>> you mean that both should be together; I have this implemented like that as my
>> first take as a domain_alloc passed flags, but I was a little undecided because
>> we are adding another domain_alloc() op for the user-managed pagetable and after
>> having another one we would end up with 3 ways of creating iommu domain -- but
>> maybe that's not an issue
> 
> It should ride on the same user domain alloc op as some generic flags,

OK, I suppose that makes sense specially with this being tied in HWPT_ALLOC
where all this new user domain alloc does.

> there is no immediate use case to enable dirty tracking for
> non-iommufd page tables

True



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux