Re: [PATCH RFCv2 04/24] iommu: Add iommu_domain ops for dirty tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:46:30PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> Add to iommu domain operations a set of callbacks to perform dirty
> tracking, particulary to start and stop tracking and finally to read and
> clear the dirty data.
> 
> Drivers are generally expected to dynamically change its translation
> structures to toggle the tracking and flush some form of control state
> structure that stands in the IOVA translation path. Though it's not
> mandatory, as drivers will be enable dirty tracking at boot, and just flush
> the IO pagetables when setting dirty tracking.  For each of the newly added
> IOMMU core APIs:
> 
> .supported_flags[IOMMU_DOMAIN_F_ENFORCE_DIRTY]: Introduce a set of flags
> that enforce certain restrictions in the iommu_domain object. For dirty
> tracking this means that when IOMMU_DOMAIN_F_ENFORCE_DIRTY is set via its
> helper iommu_domain_set_flags(...) devices attached via attach_dev will
> fail on devices that do *not* have dirty tracking supported. IOMMU drivers
> that support dirty tracking should advertise this flag, while enforcing
> that dirty tracking is supported by the device in its .attach_dev iommu op.
> 
> iommu_cap::IOMMU_CAP_DIRTY: new device iommu_capable value when probing for
> capabilities of the device.
> 
> .set_dirty_tracking(): an iommu driver is expected to change its
> translation structures and enable dirty tracking for the devices in the
> iommu_domain. For drivers making dirty tracking always-enabled, it should
> just return 0.
> 
> .read_and_clear_dirty(): an iommu driver is expected to walk the iova range
> passed in and use iommu_dirty_bitmap_record() to record dirty info per
> IOVA. When detecting a given IOVA is dirty it should also clear its dirty
> state from the PTE, *unless* the flag IOMMU_DIRTY_NO_CLEAR is passed in --
> flushing is steered from the caller of the domain_op via iotlb_gather. The
> iommu core APIs use the same data structure in use for dirty tracking for
> VFIO device dirty (struct iova_bitmap) abstracted by
> iommu_dirty_bitmap_record() helper function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c      | 11 +++++++
>  include/linux/io-pgtable.h |  4 +++
>  include/linux/iommu.h      | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 2088caae5074..95acc543e8fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -2013,6 +2013,17 @@ struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain_alloc(const struct bus_type *bus)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_alloc);
>  
> +int iommu_domain_set_flags(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			   const struct bus_type *bus, unsigned long val)
> +{

Definately no bus argument.

The supported_flags should be in the domain op not the bus op.

But I think this is sort of the wrong direction, the dirty tracking
mode should be requested when the domain is created, not changed after
the fact.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux