Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Use MTRR macros to define possible MTRR MSR ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Use MTRR macros to define possible MTRR MSR ranges
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:02:45 +0800
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wenyao Hai <haiwenyao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ke Guo <guoke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230503182852.3431281-4-seanjc@google.com>
References: <20230503182852.3431281-1-seanjc@google.com> <20230503182852.3431281-4-seanjc@google.com>
Reply-to: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:28:50AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use the MTRR macros to identify the ranges of possible MTRR MSRs instead

What about using MTRR macros to replace other 0x200 in mtrr.c too?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Use MTRR macros to define possible MTRR MSR ranges
  - From: Sean Christopherson

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: Clean up MSR PAT handling
  - From: Sean Christopherson
- [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Use MTRR macros to define possible MTRR MSR ranges
  - From: Sean Christopherson

Prev by Date: [kvm-unit-tests v4 3/4] x86: Add test cases for LAM_{U48,U57}
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v20 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Use MTRR macros to define possible MTRR MSR ranges
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Use MTRR macros to define possible MTRR MSR ranges
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux