Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 02 May 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2022, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:19:26PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 03:34:04PM +0000, Bhatnagar, Rishabh wrote:
> > > > > Gentle reminder to review this patch series.
> > > > 
> > > > Gentle reminder to never top-post :)
> > > > 
> > > > Also, it's up to the KVM maintainers if they wish to review this or not.
> > > > I can't make them care about old and obsolete kernels like 5.10.y.  Why
> > > > not just use 5.15.y or newer?
> > > 
> > > Given the lack of responses here from the KVM developers, I'll drop this
> > > from my mbox and wait for them to be properly reviewed and resend before
> > > considering them for a stable release.
> > 
> > KVM maintainers,
> > 
> > Would someone be kind enough to take a look at this for Greg please?
> > 
> > Note that at least one of the patches in this set has been identified as
> > a fix for a serious security issue regarding the compromise of guest
> > kernels due to the mishandling of flush operations.
> 
> A minor note, the security issue is serious _if_ the bug can be exploited, which
> as is often the case for KVM, is a fairly big "if".  Jann's PoC relied on collusion
> between host userspace and the guest kernel, and as Jann called out, triggering
> the bug on a !PREEMPT host kernel would be quite difficult in practice.
> 
> I don't want to downplay the seriousness of compromising guest security, but CVSS
> scores for KVM CVEs almost always fail to account for the multitude of factors in
> play.  E.g. CVE-2023-30456 also had a score of 7.8, and that bug required disabling
> EPT, which pretty much no one does when running untrusted guest code.
> 
> In other words, take the purported severity with a grain of salt.
> 
> > Please could someone confirm or otherwise that this is relevant for
> > v5.10.y and older?
> 
> Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for taking the time to provide some background information and
for the Ack Sean, much appreciated.

For anyone taking notice, I expect a little lag on this still whilst
Greg is AFK.  I'll follow-up in a few days.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux