On Wed, 21 Sep 2022, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:19:26PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 03:34:04PM +0000, Bhatnagar, Rishabh wrote: > > > Gentle reminder to review this patch series. > > > > Gentle reminder to never top-post :) > > > > Also, it's up to the KVM maintainers if they wish to review this or not. > > I can't make them care about old and obsolete kernels like 5.10.y. Why > > not just use 5.15.y or newer? > > Given the lack of responses here from the KVM developers, I'll drop this > from my mbox and wait for them to be properly reviewed and resend before > considering them for a stable release. KVM maintainers, Would someone be kind enough to take a look at this for Greg please? Note that at least one of the patches in this set has been identified as a fix for a serious security issue regarding the compromise of guest kernels due to the mishandling of flush operations. Please could someone confirm or otherwise that this is relevant for v5.10.y and older? Thank you. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
