Hi Jing,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:19:50PM -0700, Jing Zhang wrote:
> Hi Reiji,
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 9:59 PM Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jing,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 03:53:44AM +0000, Jing Zhang wrote:
> > > Refactor writings for ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.[CSV2|CSV3],
> > > ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer and ID_DFR0_ELF.PerfMon based on utilities
> > > introduced by ID register descriptor array.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c | 284 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 3 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > > index 6bf013fb110d..dc769c2eb7a4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> > > @@ -915,6 +915,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_vmid_bits(u64 mmfr1)
> > > return 8;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new, s64 cur);
> > > struct arm64_ftr_reg *get_arm64_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id);
> > >
> > > extern struct arm64_ftr_override id_aa64mmfr1_override;
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > index 2e3e55139777..677ec4fe9f6b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static u64 arm64_ftr_set_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 reg,
> > > return reg;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new,
> > > +s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new,
> > > s64 cur)
> > > {
> > > s64 ret = 0;
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c
> > > index fe37b6786b4c..33968ada29bb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,66 @@
> > >
> > > #include "sys_regs.h"
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * arm64_check_features() - Check if a feature register value constitutes
> > > + * a subset of features indicated by the idreg's KVM sanitised limit.
> > > + *
> > > + * This function will check if each feature field of @val is the "safe" value
> > > + * against idreg's KVM sanitised limit return from reset() callback.
> > > + * If a field value in @val is the same as the one in limit, it is always
> > > + * considered the safe value regardless For register fields that are not in
> > > + * writable, only the value in limit is considered the safe value.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 if all the fields are safe. Otherwise, return negative errno.
> > > + */
> > > +static int arm64_check_features(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > > + u64 val)
> > > +{
> > > + const struct arm64_ftr_reg *ftr_reg;
> > > + const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp = NULL;
> > > + u32 id = reg_to_encoding(rd);
> > > + u64 writable_mask = rd->val;
> > > + u64 limit = 0;
> > > + u64 mask = 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* For hidden and unallocated idregs without reset, only val = 0 is allowed. */
> > > + if (rd->reset) {
> > > + limit = rd->reset(vcpu, rd);
> > > + ftr_reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(id);
> > > + if (!ftr_reg)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + ftrp = ftr_reg->ftr_bits;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (; ftrp && ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
> > > + s64 f_val, f_lim, safe_val;
> > > + u64 ftr_mask;
> > > +
> > > + ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
> > > + if ((ftr_mask & writable_mask) != ftr_mask)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + f_val = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, val);
> > > + f_lim = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, limit);
> > > + mask |= ftr_mask;
> > > +
> > > + if (f_val == f_lim)
> > > + safe_val = f_val;
> > > + else
> > > + safe_val = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, f_val, f_lim);
> >
> > Since PMUVer and PerfMon is defined as FTR_EXACT, I believe having lower
> > value in those two fields than the limit always ends up getting -E2BIG.
> > Or am I missing something ??
> > FYI. IIRC, we have some more fields in other ID registers that KVM
> > shouldn't use as is.
> Yes, you are right. I will add code to handle these exceptions.
> >
> > > +
> > > + if (safe_val != f_val)
> > > + return -E2BIG;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* For fields that are not writable, values in limit are the safe values. */
> > > + if ((val & ~mask) != (limit & ~mask))
> > > + return -E2BIG;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static u8 vcpu_pmuver(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > {
> > > if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
> > > @@ -68,7 +128,6 @@ u64 kvm_arm_read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> > > case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1:
> > > if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
> > > val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SVE);
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU);
> > > if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V3) {
> > > val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_GIC);
> > > val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_GIC), 1);
> > > @@ -95,15 +154,10 @@ u64 kvm_arm_read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> > > val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1_WFxT);
> > > break;
> > > case SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1:
> > > - /* Limit debug to ARMv8.0 */
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer);
> > > - val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer), 6);
> > > /* Set PMUver to the required version */
> > > val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer);
> > > val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),
> > > vcpu_pmuver(vcpu));
> > > - /* Hide SPE from guests */
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer);
> > > break;
> > > case SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1:
> > > val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon);
> > > @@ -162,9 +216,14 @@ static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > > static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > > u64 val)
> > > {
> > > - /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> > > - if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd))
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + u32 id = reg_to_encoding(rd);
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = arm64_check_features(vcpu, rd, val);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + IDREG(vcpu->kvm, id) = val;
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -198,12 +257,40 @@ static unsigned int aa32_id_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > return id_visibility(vcpu, r);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static u64 read_sanitised_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
> > > +{
> > > + u64 val;
> > > + u32 id = reg_to_encoding(rd);
> > > +
> > > + val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
> > > + /*
> > > + * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 if the HW isn't affected.
> > > + * Although this is a per-CPU feature, we make it global because
> > > + * asymmetric systems are just a nuisance.
> > > + *
> > > + * Userspace can override this as long as it doesn't promise
> > > + * the impossible.
> > > + */
> > > + if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED) {
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2), 1);
> > > + }
> > > + if (arm64_get_meltdown_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED) {
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3), 1);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU);
> > > +
> > > + return val;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > > u64 val)
> > > {
> > > u8 csv2, csv3;
> > > - u64 sval = val;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Allow AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 to be set from userspace as long as
> > > @@ -219,16 +306,30 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > if (csv3 > 1 || (csv3 && arm64_get_meltdown_state() != SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - /* We can only differ with CSV[23], and anything else is an error */
> > > - val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> > > - val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2) |
> > > - ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3));
> > > - if (val)
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + return set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static u64 read_sanitised_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
> > > +{
> > > + u64 val;
> > > + u32 id = reg_to_encoding(rd);
> > >
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, reg_to_encoding(rd)) = sval;
> > > + val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
> > > + /* Limit debug to ARMv8.0 */
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer), 6);
> > > + /*
> > > + * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to
> > > + * create an actual PMU.
> > > + */
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),
> > > + kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
> > > + /* Hide SPE from guests */
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer);
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > + return val;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > @@ -237,6 +338,7 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > {
> > > u8 pmuver, host_pmuver;
> > > bool valid_pmu;
> > > + int ret;
> > >
> > > host_pmuver = kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit();
> > >
> > > @@ -256,36 +358,61 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) != valid_pmu)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - /* We can only differ with PMUver, and anything else is an error */
> > > - val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer);
> > > - if (val)
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!valid_pmu) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Ignore the PMUVer filed in @val. The PMUVer would be determined
> > > + * by arch flags bit KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU,
> > > + */
> > > + pmuver = FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK, read_id_reg(vcpu, rd));
> >
> > As vPMU is not configured for this vCPU, I believe pmuver will be
> > 0x0 or 0xf. I think that is not what we want there.
> > Or am I missing something ?
> As stated in the comment, when vPMU is not configured, the PMUVer
> observed by the guest would be determined by arch flags bit
> KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU. The value in the fields of idreg
> doesn't matter. Here is just a trick to ignore the check for the
> PMUVer field.
That sounds like what I understand. But, I still think the code is
different from that.
When we get here, this vcpu has no PMU. Since PMUVer in the @val is
already validated earlier in this function, PMUVer in the @val is
0 or 0xf. As this vcpu has no PMU, the "pmuver" (the current PMUVer
for this vcpu) is also 0 or 0xf. So, I wonder why the field in
@val needs to be updated with the "pmuver". Do you want to simply
clear the field or do you mean IDREG() instead of read_id_reg() ?
Thank you,
Reiji
> >
> >
> > > + val &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK;
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK, pmuver);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > - if (valid_pmu) {
> > > - mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK;
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK,
> > > - pmuver);
> > > + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > >
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) &= ~ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK;
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK,
> > > - pmuver_to_perfmon(pmuver));
> > > + ret = set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > > - } else {
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) &= ~ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK;
> > > + IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK,
> > > + pmuver_to_perfmon(pmuver));
> > > +
> > > + if (!valid_pmu)
> > > assign_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags,
> > > pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF);
> > > - }
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static u64 read_sanitised_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
> > > +{
> > > + u64 val;
> > > + u32 id = reg_to_encoding(rd);
> > > +
> > > + val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
> > > + /*
> > > + * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to
> > > + * create an actual PMU.
> > > + */
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon), kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
> > > +
> > > + return val;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > > u64 val)
> > > {
> > > u8 perfmon, host_perfmon;
> > > bool valid_pmu;
> > > + int ret;
> > >
> > > host_perfmon = pmuver_to_perfmon(kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
> > >
> > > @@ -306,25 +433,33 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) != valid_pmu)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - /* We can only differ with PerfMon, and anything else is an error */
> > > - val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon);
> > > - if (val)
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!valid_pmu) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Ignore the PerfMon filed in @val. The PerfMon would be determined
> > > + * by arch flags bit KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU,
> > > + */
> >
> > I have the same comment as set_id_aa64dfr0_el1().
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Reiji
> >
> > > + perfmon = FIELD_GET(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK, read_id_reg(vcpu, rd));
> > > + val &= ~ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK;
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK, perfmon);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > - if (valid_pmu) {
> > > - mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) &= ~ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK;
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK, perfmon);
> > > + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > >
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK;
> > > - IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK,
> > > - perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon));
> > > + ret = set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > > - } else {
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK;
> > > + IDREG(vcpu->kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK,
> > > + perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon));
> > > +
> > > + if (!valid_pmu)
> > > assign_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags,
> > > perfmon == ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_IMPDEF);
> > > - }
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -402,9 +537,13 @@ const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM] = {
> > > /* CRm=1 */
> > > AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR0_EL1),
> > > AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR1_EL1),
> > > - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
> > > - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1,
> > > - .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, },
> > > + { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1),
> > > + .access = access_id_reg,
> > > + .get_user = get_id_reg,
> > > + .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1,
> > > + .visibility = aa32_id_visibility,
> > > + .reset = read_sanitised_id_dfr0_el1,
> > > + .val = ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_MASK, },
> > > ID_HIDDEN(ID_AFR0_EL1),
> > > AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR0_EL1),
> > > AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR1_EL1),
> > > @@ -433,8 +572,12 @@ const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM] = {
> > >
> > > /* AArch64 ID registers */
> > > /* CRm=4 */
> > > - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
> > > - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, },
> > > + { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1),
> > > + .access = access_id_reg,
> > > + .get_user = get_id_reg,
> > > + .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
> > > + .reset = read_sanitised_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
> > > + .val = ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2_MASK | ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3_MASK, },
> > > ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
> > > ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 2),
> > > ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 3),
> > > @@ -444,8 +587,12 @@ const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM] = {
> > > ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 7),
> > >
> > > /* CRm=5 */
> > > - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
> > > - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1, },
> > > + { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1),
> > > + .access = access_id_reg,
> > > + .get_user = get_id_reg,
> > > + .set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1,
> > > + .reset = read_sanitised_id_aa64dfr0_el1,
> > > + .val = ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_MASK, },
> > > ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1),
> > > ID_UNALLOCATED(5, 2),
> > > ID_UNALLOCATED(5, 3),
> > > @@ -520,33 +667,4 @@ void kvm_arm_init_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
> > >
> > > IDREG(kvm, id) = val;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 if the HW isn't affected.
> > > - * Although this is a per-CPU feature, we make it global because
> > > - * asymmetric systems are just a nuisance.
> > > - *
> > > - * Userspace can override this as long as it doesn't promise
> > > - * the impossible.
> > > - */
> > > - val = IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
> > > -
> > > - if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED) {
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2);
> > > - val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2), 1);
> > > - }
> > > - if (arm64_get_meltdown_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED) {
> > > - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3);
> > > - val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3), 1);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) = val;
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to
> > > - * create an actual PMU.
> > > - */
> > > - IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer);
> > > - IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1) |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer),
> > > - kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog
> > >
> Thanks,
> Jing
