On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 01:52:43PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:23:01PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > > It's probably best if neither depend on each other, since they're > > > independent, but otherwise the order doesn't matter. It'd be nice to call > > > the order out in the cover letter to give patchwork a chance at automatic > > > build testing, though. To call it out, I believe adding > > > > > > Based-on: 20230401112730.2105240-1-apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > to the cover letter should work. > > > > I also just noticed that this based on "RISC-V: KVM: Add ONE_REG > > interface to enable/disable SBI extensions"[1] and it needs to be > > in order to pick up the KVM_REG_RISCV_SUBTYPE_MASK and > > KVM_REG_RISCV_SUBTYPE_SHIFT defines. It'd be good to call that > > patch out with Based-on. > > > > [1]: 20230331174542.2067560-2-apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I've been waiting for a review on that for a while.. It's been 3 > weeks, so just gonna merge it and see what breaks! I did in fact break some stuff, but the output was no worse than if the dependencies had not been specified... I've fixed it (I think!) and told it to ignore the old state, so it'll re-run against the stuff it missed. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
