On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 01:52:43PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 02:23:01PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > It's probably best if neither depend on each other, since they're > > independent, but otherwise the order doesn't matter. It'd be nice to call > > the order out in the cover letter to give patchwork a chance at automatic > > build testing, though. To call it out, I believe adding > > > > Based-on: 20230401112730.2105240-1-apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > to the cover letter should work. > > I also just noticed that this based on "RISC-V: KVM: Add ONE_REG > interface to enable/disable SBI extensions"[1] and it needs to be > in order to pick up the KVM_REG_RISCV_SUBTYPE_MASK and > KVM_REG_RISCV_SUBTYPE_SHIFT defines. It'd be good to call that > patch out with Based-on. > > [1]: 20230331174542.2067560-2-apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I've been waiting for a review on that for a while.. It's been 3 weeks, so just gonna merge it and see what breaks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
