On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 03:25:25 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:18:56AM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:22 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:10:31 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> > > > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> > > > notifications.
> > > >
> > > > In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> > > > packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit
> > > > available index.
> > > >
> > > > Add support for this feature for MMIO, channel I/O and modern PCI
> > > > transports.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > v4: remove VP_NOTIFY macro and legacy PCI support, add
> > > > virtio_ccw_kvm_notify_with_data to virtio_ccw
> > > > v3: support feature in virtio_ccw, remove VM_NOTIFY, use avail_idx_shadow,
> > > > remove byte swap, rename to vring_notification_data
> > > > v2: reject the feature in virtio_ccw, replace __le32 with u32
> > > >
> > > > Tested with disabled VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA on qemu-system-s390x
> > > > (virtio-blk-ccw), qemu-system-riscv64 (virtio-blk-device,
> > > > virtio-rng-device), qemu-system-x86_64 (virtio-blk-pci, virtio-net-pci)
> > > > to make sure nothing is broken.
> > > > Tested with enabled VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA on 64-bit RISC-V Linux
> > > > and my hardware implementation of virtio-rng.
> > > >
> > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 2 ++
> > > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 6 ++++++
> > > > 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > index 954fc31b4bc7..3619676effb8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> > > > ccw_device_dma_free(vcdev->cdev, thinint_area, sizeof(*thinint_area));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > +static inline bool virtio_ccw_do_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq, u32 data)
> > > > {
> > > > struct virtio_ccw_vq_info *info = vq->priv;
> > > > struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev;
> > > > @@ -402,12 +402,22 @@ static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct subchannel_id) != sizeof(unsigned int));
> > > > info->cookie = kvm_hypercall3(KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY,
> > > > *((unsigned int *)&schid),
> > > > - vq->index, info->cookie);
> > > > + data, info->cookie);
> > > > if (info->cookie < 0)
> > > > return false;
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return virtio_ccw_do_kvm_notify(vq, vq->index);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return virtio_ccw_do_kvm_notify(vq, vring_notification_data(vq));
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static int virtio_ccw_read_vq_conf(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> > > > struct ccw1 *ccw, int index)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -501,6 +511,9 @@ static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> > > > u64 queue;
> > > > unsigned long flags;
> > > > bool may_reduce;
> > > > + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq) = __virtio_test_bit(vdev,
> > > > + VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) ?
> > > > + virtio_ccw_kvm_notify_with_data : virtio_ccw_kvm_notify;
> > > >
> > > > /* Allocate queue. */
> > > > info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_ccw_vq_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > @@ -524,7 +537,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> > > > may_reduce = vcdev->revision > 0;
> > > > vq = vring_create_virtqueue(i, info->num, KVM_VIRTIO_CCW_RING_ALIGN,
> > > > vdev, true, may_reduce, ctx,
> > > > - virtio_ccw_kvm_notify, callback, name);
> > > > + notify, callback, name);
> > > >
> > > > if (!vq) {
> > > > /* For now, we fail if we can't get the requested size. */
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > index 3ff746e3f24a..7c16e622c33d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.cv
> > > > @@ -285,6 +285,16 @@ static bool vm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static bool vm_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct virtio_mmio_device *vm_dev = to_virtio_mmio_device(vq->vdev);
> > > > + u32 data = vring_notification_data(vq);
> > > > +
> > > > + writel(data, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_NOTIFY);
> > > > +
> > > > + return true;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > /* Notify all virtqueues on an interrupt. */
> > > > static irqreturn_t vm_interrupt(int irq, void *opaque)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -368,6 +378,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *vm_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int in
> > > > unsigned long flags;
> > > > unsigned int num;
> > > > int err;
> > > > + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq) = __virtio_test_bit(vdev,
> > > > + VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) ? vm_notify_with_data : vm_notify;
> > >
> > >
> > > Can we optimize this line?
> >
> > What kind of optimization do you mean?
>
> In fact speed does not matter here but it is not very readable.
> Use of "?" was justified if you put this inside the call to vring_create_virtqueue
> (which I still feel would be best).
> But if you use a variable, just use plain if:
>
> bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq);
>
> if (__virtio_test_bit(vdev,VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA))
> vq = vm_notify_with_data;
> else
> vq = vm_notify;
Yes, I mean this, I don't mean performance. It refers to the form of code. It
should be that my expression is inaccurate.
Thanks.
>
>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > if (!name)
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > @@ -397,7 +409,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vm_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int in
> > > >
> > > > /* Create the vring */
> > > > vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num, VIRTIO_MMIO_VRING_ALIGN, vdev,
> > > > - true, true, ctx, vm_notify, callback, name);
> > > > + true, true, ctx, notify, callback, name);
> > > > if (!vq) {
> > > > err = -ENOMEM;
> > > > goto error_new_virtqueue;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> > > > index 9e496e288cfa..9cc56f463dba 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> > > > @@ -288,6 +288,15 @@ static u16 vp_config_vector(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev, u16 vector)
> > > > return vp_modern_config_vector(&vp_dev->mdev, vector);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static bool vp_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > +{
> > > > + u32 data = vring_notification_data(vq);
> > > > +
> > > > + iowrite32(data, (void __iomem *)vq->priv);
> > > > +
> > > > + return true;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> > > > struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info,
> > > > unsigned int index,
> > > > @@ -301,6 +310,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> > > > struct virtqueue *vq;
> > > > u16 num;
> > > > int err;
> > > > + bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq) = __virtio_test_bit(&vp_dev->vdev,
> > > > + VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) ? vp_notify_with_data : vp_notify;
> > > >
> > > > if (index >= vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev))
> > > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > @@ -321,7 +332,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> > > > vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num,
> > > > SMP_CACHE_BYTES, &vp_dev->vdev,
> > > > true, true, ctx,
> > > > - vp_notify, callback, name);
> > > > + notify, callback, name);
> > > > if (!vq)
> > > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > index 4c3bb0ddeb9b..837875cc3190 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > @@ -2752,6 +2752,21 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_del_virtqueue);
> > > >
> > > > +u32 vring_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > > > + u16 next;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (vq->packed_ring)
> > > > + next = (vq->packed.next_avail_idx & ~(1 << 15)) |
> > > > + vq->packed.avail_wrap_counter << 15;
> > > > + else
> > > > + next = vq->split.avail_idx_shadow;
> > > > +
> > > > + return next << 16 | _vq->index;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_notification_data);
> > > > +
> > > > /* Manipulates transport-specific feature bits. */
> > > > void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -2771,6 +2786,8 @@ void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > break;
> > > > case VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM:
> > > > break;
> > > > + case VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA:
> > > > + break;
> > > > default:
> > > > /* We don't understand this bit. */
> > > > __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, i);
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > > > index 8b95b69ef694..2550c9170f4f 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > > > @@ -117,4 +117,6 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *vq);
> > > > void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev);
> > > >
> > > > irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq);
> > > > +
> > > > +u32 vring_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq);
> > > > #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_RING_H */
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > index 3c05162bc988..2c712c654165 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@
> > > > */
> > > > #define VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV 37
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This feature indicates that the driver passes extra data (besides
> > > > + * identifying the virtqueue) in its device notifications.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 38
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * This feature indicates that the driver can reset a queue individually.
> > > > */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.35.1
> > > >
>
