Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "kvm" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 5:33:57 AM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems > >> Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm" >>>> <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev" >>>> <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:28:20 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems >>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm" >>>>> <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Cc: "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 5:40:01 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems >>>> >>>>> Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>>> This patch series reenables VFIO support on POWER systems. It >>>>>> is based on Alexey Kardashevskiys's patch series, rebased and >>>>>> successfully tested under QEMU with a Marvell PCIe SATA controller >>>>>> on a POWER9 Blackbird host. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >>>>>> powerpc/iommu: Add "borrowing" iommu_table_group_ops >>>>>> powerpc/pci_64: Init pcibios subsys a bit later >>>>>> powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking >>>>>> domains >>>>> >>>>> As sent the patches had lost Alexey's authorship (no From: line), I >>>>> fixed it up when applying so the first 3 are authored by Alexey. >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>> >>>> Thanks for catching that, it wasn't intentional. Probably used a wrong Git >>>> command... >>> >>> Just wanted to touch base on the patches, since they're still listed as Under >>> Review on patchwork. Are we good to go for the 6.4 merge window? >> >> They've been in my next (and so linux-next), since last week. I just >> haven't updated patchwork yet. >> >> So yeah they are on track to go into mainline during the v6.4 merge window. >> >> cheers > > Sounds great, thanks! Saw them in the next tree but wasn't sure if the patchwork status was more reflective of overall status. Yeah I guess patchwork is more reflective. I sometimes put things in next for a few days to see if any issues shake out, before I update patchwork. Mainly because it's a pain to un-update patchwork if the patch needs to be backed out, but also as a signal that the patch isn't quite locked into next yet. cheers
