----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "kvm" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 5:33:57 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems > Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm" >>> <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev" >>> <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:28:20 PM >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm" >>>> <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 5:40:01 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems >>> >>>> Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>> This patch series reenables VFIO support on POWER systems. It >>>>> is based on Alexey Kardashevskiys's patch series, rebased and >>>>> successfully tested under QEMU with a Marvell PCIe SATA controller >>>>> on a POWER9 Blackbird host. >>>>> >>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >>>>> powerpc/iommu: Add "borrowing" iommu_table_group_ops >>>>> powerpc/pci_64: Init pcibios subsys a bit later >>>>> powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking >>>>> domains >>>> >>>> As sent the patches had lost Alexey's authorship (no From: line), I >>>> fixed it up when applying so the first 3 are authored by Alexey. >>>> >>>> cheers >>> >>> Thanks for catching that, it wasn't intentional. Probably used a wrong Git >>> command... >> >> Just wanted to touch base on the patches, since they're still listed as Under >> Review on patchwork. Are we good to go for the 6.4 merge window? > > They've been in my next (and so linux-next), since last week. I just > haven't updated patchwork yet. > > So yeah they are on track to go into mainline during the v6.4 merge window. > > cheers Sounds great, thanks! Saw them in the next tree but wasn't sure if the patchwork status was more reflective of overall status.
