Re: [PATCH 5/8] kvm: Add cap/kvm_run field for memory fault exits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2023, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:16:11 +0000, Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  8. Other capabilities.
> >  ======================
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 109b18e2789c4..9352e7f8480fb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -801,6 +801,9 @@ struct kvm {
> >  	bool vm_bugged;
> >  	bool vm_dead;
> >  
> > +	rwlock_t mem_fault_nowait_lock;
> > +	bool mem_fault_nowait;
> 
> A full-fat rwlock to protect a single bool? What benefits do you
> expect from a rwlock? Why is it preferable to an atomic access, or a
> simple bitop?

There's no need to have any kind off dedicated atomicity.  The only readers are
in vCPU context, just disallow KVM_CAP_MEM_FAULT_NOWAIT after vCPUs are created.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux