Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: x86: Intercept CR4.LAM_SUP when LAM feature is enabled in guest

[Robert Hoo <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 20:24 +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 17:00 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
> > According to the code of set_cr4_guest_host_mask,
> > vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_owned_bits is a subset of
> > KVM_POSSIBLE_CR4_GUEST_BITS,
> > and X86_CR4_LAM_SUP is not included in KVM_POSSIBLE_CR4_GUEST_BITS.
> > No matter change CR4_RESERVED_BITS or not, X86_CR4_LAM_SUP will
> > always be set in CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK.

yes, bits set to 1 in a guest/host mask means it's “owned” by the host.
> > 
> > 
> 
> set_cr4_guest_host_mask():
> 	vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_owned_bits = KVM_POSSIBLE_CR4_GUEST_BITS &
> 			~vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits;
> 
> kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid():
> 	vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits =
> 	    __cr4_reserved_bits(guest_cpuid_has, vcpu);