On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:54:30 +0000, Shivam Kumar <shivam.kumar1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 12/02/23 10:39 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 06:52:02 +0000, > > Shivam Kumar <shivam.kumar1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Hi Marc, > >>> > >>> I'm proposing this new implementation to address the concern you > >>> raised regarding dirty quota being a non-generic feature with the > >>> previous implementation. This implementation decouples dirty quota > >>> from dirty logging for the ARM64 arch. We shall post a similar > >>> implementation for x86 if this looks good. With this new > >>> implementation, dirty quota can be enforced independent of dirty > >>> logging. Dirty quota is now in bytes and > >> > >> Hi Marc, > >> > >> Thank you for your valuable feedback so far. Looking forward to your > >> feedback on this new proposition. > > > > I'm not sure what you are expecting from me here. I've explained in > > great details what I wanted to see, repeatedly. This above says > > nothing other than "we are going to do *something* that matches your > > expectations". > > > > My answer is, to quote someone else, "show me the code". Until then, I > > don't have much to add. > > > > Thanks, > > > > M. > > > > Hi Marc, > > I had posted some code in the previous comment. Let me tag you there. You posted a tiny snippet that is completely out of context. I took the time to fully review your series and provide extensive comments. You could, similarly, take the time to post a complete series for people to review the new proposal. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
