On 12/02/23 10:39 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 06:52:02 +0000,
Shivam Kumar <shivam.kumar1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Marc,
I'm proposing this new implementation to address the concern you
raised regarding dirty quota being a non-generic feature with the
previous implementation. This implementation decouples dirty quota
from dirty logging for the ARM64 arch. We shall post a similar
implementation for x86 if this looks good. With this new
implementation, dirty quota can be enforced independent of dirty
logging. Dirty quota is now in bytes and
Hi Marc,
Thank you for your valuable feedback so far. Looking forward to your
feedback on this new proposition.
I'm not sure what you are expecting from me here. I've explained in
great details what I wanted to see, repeatedly. This above says
nothing other than "we are going to do *something* that matches your
expectations".
My answer is, to quote someone else, "show me the code". Until then, I
don't have much to add.
Thanks,
M.
Hi Marc,
I had posted some code in the previous comment. Let me tag you there.
Thanks,
Shivam
