On 03/02/2010 04:29 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
I guess the first step would be to move away from the 'lets support lots of
crappy virtualization solutions at once, poorly' model, and pick one good
combo (i'd go for Qemu+KVM) and turn it into a heck of an all-around solution.
Then all the other combos will catch up as well. (or will wither away)
Should desktop integration be GNOME or KDE based?
IMO this should be addressed via a plugin system so that we can have a
well integrated single process VM, without choosing one or the other.
Also, the qemu community doesn't really have serious graphics design
expertise; best to leave that to people who won't make it a total disaster.
( Sidenote: i also looked at the VirtualBox kernel driver. Oh my ... i really
shouldnt have! They should migrate to the KVM kernel-side code ASAP ... )
They can't, if they want to continue to support hardware without
virtualization extensions.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
