On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 20:19:11 +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> > Commit c3134ce240eed ("KVM: Replace old tlb flush function with new one
> > to flush a specified range.") replaces old tlb flush function with
> > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address() to do tlb flushing. However, the
> > gfn range of tlb flushing is wrong in some cases. E.g., when a spte is
> > dropped, the start gfn of tlb flushing should be the gfn of spte not the
> > base gfn of SP which contains the spte. Although, as Paolo said, Hyper-V
> > may treat a 1-page flush the same if the address points to a huge page,
> > and no fixes are reported so far. So it seems that it works well for
> > Hyper-V. But it would be better to use the correct size for huge page.
> > So this patchset would fix them and introduce some helper functions as
> > David suggested to make the code clear.
> >
> > [...]
>
> David and/or Hou, it's probably a good idea to double check my results, there
> were a few minor conflicts and I doubt anything would fail if I messed up.
Gah, doesn't even compile because I missed a paranthesis. Messed up my scripts
and didn't pull 'mmu' into 'next.
Force pushed, new hashes are below. Testing now...
[1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Move round_gfn_for_level() helper into mmu_internal.h
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/bb05964f0a3c
[2/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in kvm_set_pte_rmapp()
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/c61baeaa2a14
[3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Reduce gfn range of tlb flushing in tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level()
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/24c17bc3def7
[4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong start gfn of tlb flushing with range
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/873f68d8dac3
[5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in validate_direct_spte()
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/22f34c933198
[6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Cleanup range-based flushing for given page
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/e7b406974086
