> > Eh, just drop the comment. Pretty obvious this is for secondary execution controls. Thanks Sean. Well, I agree it is obvious. This line was kept because there are comments for other groups of control fields(e.g., exit/entry/pin-based/cpu-based controls etc.) in nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(). If we do not keep the one for secondary cpu-based controls, we may just delete other comments as well. But is that really necessary? B.R. Yu
