> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 3:59 PM > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:30:20AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > I'm not sure how awkward is for migration driver to ask the controlling > > device driver to operate a migration action. > > It can't. That's the whole point. The controlled function that is > being migrate must be absolutely unaware of that (except for things > like quiescing access or FLRs that could happen anyway), because > otherwise your have a fundamental information leak. > Can you elaborate which information is leaked? No matter who provides the uAPI (controlling or controlled), end of the day it's the same cmd invoked on the controlling device to save/ restore the state of the controlled device itself.
