Re: Nested SVM and migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/24/2010 05:23 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 02:09:15PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 02:54:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
So, if some other cpu (or the guest itself, with appropriate
permissions) modifies the msr permission bitmap, svm will not notice
this?  svm loads the bitmap during entry?
Yes.
Talked again with a few people about it and the architectural answer is
a bit different. The right answer to that is:

The cpu is allowed to load the msr permission map to internal state, but
not required to do it by the architecture. The result of changing the
msr permission map of a running vmcb is undefined.

So we are fine with the way nested svm does it. And we don't need to
care about that situation at all and just migrate whats in guest memory.

Awesome!  Thanks for checking it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux