Re: Nested SVM and migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 02:54:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> So, if some other cpu (or the guest itself, with appropriate  
> permissions) modifies the msr permission bitmap, svm will not notice  
> this?  svm loads the bitmap during entry?

Yes.

> I don't think you can tell, unless the host cpu modifying the vmcb is  
> synchronized with the guest (or the guest modifies its own vmcb).  But  
> this is all academic.

Hmm, another thing comes to mind. We would need some redesign of the
nested_svm code to allow userspace to put a vcpu directly into nested
state. With the MSR approach, all userspace does is to write MSRs into
the vcpu before the first run?

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux