Re: Nested SVM and migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 06:38:36PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Simplified, this is
>
>   ioctl(vcpu_fd, KVM_VCPU_FREEZE, 0);
>
> no need to involve the entire vm IMO.  Since the vcpu thread is issuing  
> the ioctl, the vcpu isn't running.

True. Should also work, there is no information stored there which could
allow the l1 guest to break out if it is modified. At least for SVM, not
sure if this is true for vmx.

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux