On 2022/11/14 22:37, Yang, Lixiao wrote: > On 2022/11/14 20:51, Yi Liu wrote: >> On 2022/11/10 00:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:18:03PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote: >>>> On 2022/11/8 17:19, Nicolin Chen wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:52:44PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is on github: >>>>>> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/vfio_iommufd >>>>> [...] >>>>>> v2: >>>>>> - Rebase to v6.1-rc3, v4 iommufd series >>>>>> - Fixup comments and commit messages from list remarks >>>>>> - Fix leaking of the iommufd for mdevs >>>>>> - New patch to fix vfio modaliases when vfio container is disabled >>>>>> - Add a dmesg once when the iommufd provided /dev/vfio/vfio is opened >>>>>> to signal that iommufd is providing this >>>>> >>>>> I've redone my previous sanity tests. Except those reported bugs, >>>>> things look fine. Once we fix those issues, GVT and other modules >>>>> can run some more stressful tests, I think. >>>> >>>> our side is also starting test (gvt, nic passthrough) this version. >>>> need to wait a while for the result. >>> >>> I've updated the branches with the two functional fixes discussed on >>> the list plus all the doc updates. >>> >> >> I see, due to timzone, the kernel we grabbed is 37c9e6e44d77a, it has >> slight diff in the scripts/kernel-doc compared with the latest commit >> (6bb16a9c67769). I don't think it impacts the test. >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/log/?h=for-next >> (37c9e6e44d77a) >> >> Our side, Yu He, Lixiao Yang has done below tests on Intel platform >> with the above kernel, results are: >> >> 1) GVT-g test suit passed, Intel iGFx passthrough passed. >> >> 2) NIC passthrough test with different guest memory (1G/4G), passed. >> >> 3) Booting two different QEMUs in the same time but one QEMU opens >> legacy /dev/vfio/vfio and another opens /dev/iommu. Tests passed. >> >> 4) Tried below Kconfig combinations, results are expected. >> >> VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=y -- test pass >> VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=n -- test pass >> VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=y -- test pass >> VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=n -- no >> /dev/vfio/vfio, so test fail, expected >> >> 5) Tested devices from multi-device group. Assign such devices to the >> same VM, pass; assign them to different VMs, fail; assign them to a VM >> with Intel virtual VT-d, fail; Results are expected. >> >> Meanwhile, I also tested the branch in development branch for nesting, >> the basic functionality looks good. >> >> Tested-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Tested-by: Lixiao Yang <lixiao.yang@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Yu He <yu.he@xxxxxxxxx> -- Best regards, He,Yu
